Clinical performance of lung ultrasound in predicting ARDS morphology

Background

To assess diagnostic performance of lung ultrasound (LUS) in identifying ARDS morphology (focal vs non-focal), compared with the gold standard computed tomography

Methods

Mechanically ventilated ARDS patients undergoing lung computed tomography and ultrasound were enrolled. Twelve fields, were evaluated. LUS score was graded from 0 (normal) to 3 (consolidation) according to B-lines extent. Total and regional LUS score as the sum of the four ventral (LUS_V), intermediate (LUS_I) or dorsal (LUS_D) fields, were calculated. Based on lung CT, ARDS morphology was defined as (1) focal (loss of aeration with lobar distribution); (2) non-focal (widespread loss of aeration or segmental loss of aeration distribution associated with uneven lung attenuation areas), and diagnostic accuracy of LUS in discriminating ARDS morphology was determined by AU-ROC in training and validation set of patients

Results

Forty-seven patients with ARDS (25 training set and 22 validation set) were enrolled. LUS_TOT, LUS_V and LUS_I but not LUS_D score were significantly lower in focal than in non-focal ARDS morphologies ( p  < .01). The AU-ROC curve of LUS_TOT, LUS_V, LUS_I and LUS_D for identification of non-focal ARDS morphology were 0.890, 0.958, 0.884 and 0.421, respectively. LUS_V value ≥ 3 had the best predictive value (sensitivity = 0.95, specificity = 1.00) in identifying non-focal ARDS morphology. In the validation set, an LUS_V score ≥ 3 confirmed to be highly predictive of non-focal ARDS morphology, with a sensitivity and a specificity of 94% and 100%

Conclusions

LUS had a valuable performance in distinguishing ARDS morphology.