Comparison of ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein and supraclavicular subclavian vein catheterization in critically ill patients: a prospective, randomized clinical trial

Background

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of ultrasound-guided out-of-plane internal jugular vein (OOP-IJV) and in-plane supraclavicular subclavian vein (IP-SSCV) catheterization in adult intensive care unit

Methods

A total of 250 consecutive patients requiring central venous catheterization, were randomly assigned to undergo either ultrasound-guided OOP-IJV or IP-SSCV cannulation. All catheterizations were carried out by three physicians. The primary outcome was the first attempt success rate. Ultrasound scanning time, venous puncture time, insertion time, overall access time, number of puncture attempts, number of needle redirections, success rate, guidewire advancing difficulties, venous collapse and adverse events were also documented

Results

The first attempt success rate was significantly higher in IP-SSCV group (83.2%) compared to OOP-IJV group (63.2%) ( p  = 0.001). The IP-SSCV group was associated with a longer ultrasound scanning time (16.54 ± 13.51 vs. 5.26 ± 4.05 s; p  < 0.001) and a shorter insertion time (43.98 ± 26.77 vs. 53.12 ± 40.21 s; p  = 0.038). In the IP-SCCV group, we recorded a fewer number of puncture attempts (1.16 ± 0.39 vs. 1.47 ± 0.71; p  < 0.001), needle redirections (0.69 ± 0.58 vs. 1.17 ± 0.95; p  < 0.001), difficulties in guidewire advancement (2.4% vs. 27.4%; p  < 0.001), venous collapse (2.4%, vs. 18.4%; p  < 0.001) and adverse events (8.8% vs. 13.6%; p  = 0.22)

Conclusions

The IP-SSCV approach is an effective and a safe alternative to the classic OOP-IJV catheterization in critical adult patients. Trial registration : Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03879954. Registered March 19, 2019—Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03879954 .